What Is True of a Flat Character?

Flat characters are often misunderstood as being boring, weak, or poorly written, but this is not necessarily the case. A flat character is defined by their limited scope of perspective and opinions, making them one-dimensional in nature. They typically possess traits and elements that are stereotypical and recognizably so.

One of the most significant characteristics of a flat character is their lack of substantial change or growth throughout the story. Unlike round characters who undergo significant transformation, flat characters remain relatively unchanged from beginning to end. This is not to say that they are unimportant; rather, they serve a specific purpose in supporting the main character and advancing the plot.

In many stories, secondary characters often take on the role of flat characters, providing context and depth to the narrative without necessarily being the central focus. Familiarizing oneself with examples of flat characters can be beneficial in learning how to write a novel and improve overall writing skills.

The concept of flat characters originates from E.M. Forster's book 'Aspects of the Novel,' which provides valuable insight into the importance of understanding character development. Knowing what constitutes a flat character is crucial for writers, as it helps them create more well-rounded stories with diverse character types.

In conclusion, flat characters are not inherently boring or weak; they simply have distinct characteristics that set them apart from round characters. By understanding the nuances of flat characters, writers can develop their skills and craft more engaging stories with depth and complexity.

What is true of a flat character